Obj a is linked to obj b - obj b has children objects, object c,d,e.... |
Re: Suspect links for parent / child Why do people insist on having parent and child requirements in the hierarchy. DOORS does not support this very well and you are relying on the position of an object to have meaning, like it might have in a printed document. I always recommend that all text objects (i.e. the requirements) are leaf objects (no children). To answer your question, you will need lots of module specific DXL to create a smoke-and-mirrors type traceability. This will cause nothing but pain in the future when the project team changes an no one can remember why it was done like that. Tell your guys to link all the requirements to the tests that validate them. Then you can use all the suspect link functionality of DOORS straight out of the box. Creating the links using some DXL would be very simple and need only be done once. |
Re: Suspect links for parent / child Tony_Goodman - Mon Apr 20 03:02:55 EDT 2009 So in terms of Doors when say parent of requirement: 1.2.3 Text heading
we do not understand 1.2 in all cases but the requirement which is linked as parent of the 1.2.3? But what happens if there are not requirements' links in one requirement does it means that it does no have parent? |